As VPN Exploits Grow, 80 Percent of Organizations Shift Towards Zero Trust Security

by | Sep 27, 2022

VPN Risk Report

Image credit:

INDIA– Sept. 26, 2022 – Cloud security company Zscaler released the findings of its annual VPN Risk Report, conducted by Cybersecurity Insiders, which shows a growing number of VPN-specific security threats and a need for Zero Trust security architecture in enterprise-level organizations. The 2022 report surveyed over 350 IT professionals in North America at organizations with global workforces. Despite high awareness of VPN risks, remote work forced many companies to rely more heavily on legacy access methods during the pandemic. At the same time, cybercriminals continue to take advantage of long-standing security vulnerabilities and increased attacks on VPNs. This year’s Zscaler VPN Risk Report includes analysis of the state of the remote access environment, the most prevalent VPN risks, and the growth in adoption of Zero Trust.

Key Findings:

  • 68% of executives surveyed say their focus on remote work accelerated the priority of Zero Trust Security projects, up from 59% in 2021
  • Nearly half of all IT professionals surveyed witnessed an increase in exploits targeting their VPNs since adopting remote work
  • 65% of companies are considering adopting VPN alternatives; organizations should be warned of misleading legacy cloud-based VPN offerings masqueraded as Zero Trust security

“As evident in several high-profile breaches and ransomware attacks, VPNs continue to be one of the weakest links in cybersecurity. Their architecture deficiencies provide an entry point to threat actors and offer them an opportunity to move laterally and steal data,” said Deepen Desai, Global CISO of Zscaler. “To safeguard against the evolving threat landscape, organizations must use a Zero Trust architecture that, unlike VPN, does not bring the users on the same network as business-critical information, prevents lateral movement with user-app segmentation, minimizes the attack surface, and delivers full TLS inspection to prevent compromise and data loss.”

Zero Trust Secures Remote Access 

While more and more companies have employees returning to the office, 95 percent of surveyed workplaces still rely on VPNs to support a combination of hybrid and distributed work environments that often span multiple geographies. In addition to remote employees, large organizations often extend network access to other external stakeholders, including customers, partners, and contractors. In many cases these users are connecting from untrusted devices on insecure networks, are granted far more freedom than necessary, and result in additional security risks. Unlike cumbersome, insecure VPNs, Zero Trust architecture improves organizational security posture without sacrificing the user experience. In addition, Zero Trust allows IT teams to keep the location of their network and applications secret, reducing the attack surface and threat of internet-based attacks.

Status Quo Falls Behind as VPN Risks Continue To Grow

The increase in the number of remote workers across industries has resulted in a sharp spike in cyberattacks that are tailor-made to target VPN users. As VPNs grant a greater degree of trust to users when compared to Zero Trust architecture, cybercriminals are more active in seeking to gain unauthorized access to network resources through exposed attack surfaces. According to the report, 44 percent of cybersecurity professionals have witnessed an increase in exploits targeting their

business VPNs in the last year, demonstrating the risks associated with this technology when deployed to support remote users.

Legacy network security architectures are pervasive and deeply entrenched in corporate data centers, making it difficult to challenge the status quo and adopt new architectures. So it should come as no great surprise that nearly all of the organizations surveyed continue to use VPNs despite knowing they are being targeted by ransomware and malware. Meanwhile, incumbent network security vendors have a vested interest in maintaining the remote access status quo. Organizations should be wary of legacy network access approaches that rely on cloud-based VPN, and examine vendors’ architectures to understand whether they will bring significant benefits in risk reduction and user experience. VPN technology carries the same fundamental shortcomings and risks in cloud virtual machines as it does on appliances, and should be avoided in favor of more modern approaches.

VPN Alternatives Gain Traction

Ongoing risks from legacy VPNs have created a gradual shift towards Zero Trust Security, which provides greater control and flexibility for effective remote access management. 78 percent of organizations surveyed for the VPN Risk Report indicated that their future workforce will be hybrid, creating an ongoing need for this type of security infrastructure in the enterprise.

Since the shift to remote and hybrid work environments, 68 percent of surveyed companies have indicated that they are accelerating their Zero Trust projects. Unlike VPNs, Zero Trust architecture treats all network communications as potentially hostile and requires tightening access using identity-based validation policies. This ensures IT and security teams can restrict users from off-limits applications and prevent malicious intruders from taking advantage of granted access to move laterally within the network. Zero Trust security architecture also reduces network risk by eliminating the attack surface, masking activity from internet-based threats and connecting them directly to the applications and resources they need.

Click here to download and read the 2022 VPN Risk Report.

For those considering adopting zero trust as a guiding principle for architecting a secure network, An Architect’s Guide to the Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange e-book can be found here.


The 2022 Zscaler VPN report is based on the results of a comprehensive online survey of 351 IT and cybersecurity professionals. The survey was conducted in June 2022 to identify the latest enterprise adoption trends, challenges, gaps, and solution preferences related to VPN risk. The respondents range from technical executives to IT security practitioners, representing a balanced cross-section of organizations of varying sizes across North America with global workforces.

Share This Article!

Brian Pereira
Brian Pereira
Brian Pereira is an Indian journalist and editor based in Mumbai. He founded Digital Creed in 2015. A technology buff, former computer instructor, and software developer, Brian has 29 years of journalism experience (since 1994). Brian is the former Editor of CHIP India, InformationWeek India and CISO Mag. He has served India's leading newspaper groups: The Times of India and The Indian Express. Presently, he serves the Information Security Media Group, as Sr. Director, Editorial. You'll find his most current work on CIO Inc. During his career he wrote (and continues to write) 5000+ technology articles. He conducted more than 450 industry interviews. Brian writes on aviation, drones, cybersecurity, tech startups, cloud, data center, AI/ML/Gen AI, IoT, Blockchain etc. He achieved certifications from the EC-Council (Certified Secure Computer User) and from IBM (Basics of Cloud Computing). Apart from those, he has successfully completed many courses on Content Marketing and Business Writing. He recently achieved a Certificate in Cybersecurity (CC) from the international certification body ISC2. Follow Brian on Twitter (@creed_digital) and LinkedIn. Email Brian at: [email protected]
Recommended Posts
Why Landing On The Moon Is Difficult

Landing an uncrewed vehicle on the surface of the moon or any planet is not easy; space institutions have made multiple attempts after seeing their spacecraft crash on the surface.

Similar Articles

How CASB Addresses Security Policy Concerns
How CASB Addresses Security Policy Concerns

Organizations are increasingly adopting CASB to address cloud service risks, enforce security policies, and comply with regulations, even when cloud services are beyond their perimeter and out of their direct control.